Carpaccio de boeuf vs Carpaccio
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio de boeuf | Carpaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 184 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carpaccio de boeuf has 15% fewer calories (184 kcal vs 216 kcal).
- Carpaccio de boeuf has 25% less fat (12 g vs 16 g).
- Carpaccio de boeuf has 26% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Carpaccio has 51% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Carpaccio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Carpaccio de boeuf
Préparation de viande bovine marinée 89% (viande bovine 82%)huile de colza, arôme naturels), dosettes de marinade 11% (huile d'olive vierge extra 7%)eau, , jus de citron concentré 0.8%, sel, basilic 0.4%, arôme naturel basilic, arome naturel de citron, épaississant : gomme xanthane,
Carpaccio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio de boeuf or Carpaccio?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio de boeuf has fewer calories: 184 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Carpaccio de boeuf has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.