Comparison

Caponata vs Carciofini interi

Overall, Carciofini interi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaponataCarciofini interi
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 152 kcal 93 kcal
Fat 14 g 7.9 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 1.8 g
Sugars 3.2 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.9 g 2 g
Fiber 2.3 g 5.2 g
Protein 1.2 g 2.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carciofini interi has 39% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 152 kcal).
  • Carciofini interi has 44% less fat (7.9 g vs 14 g).
  • Carciofini interi has 78% less sugar (0.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Caponata has 55% less salt (0.9 g vs 2 g).
  • Carciofini interi has 56% more fiber (5.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Carciofini interi has 45% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Caponata has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Caponata

Aubergines, coulis de tomates, huile de tournesol, câpres, oignons, olives noires Grossane, vinaigre de cidre, sel, sucre de canne, ail, herbes de Provence, poivre

Carciofini interi

Carciofini 55%, olio di semi di girasole, aceto di vino, sale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caponata or Carciofini interi?

Overall, Carciofini interi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carciofini interi has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carciofini interi has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons