Calamars à la Romaine vs Anneaux À La Romaine
Overall, Calamars à la Romaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Calamars à la Romaine | Anneaux À La Romaine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 235 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | — |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Anneaux À La Romaine has 14% fewer calories (202 kcal vs 235 kcal).
- Anneaux À La Romaine has 42% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Calamars à la Romaine has 35% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Calamars à la Romaine has 40% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Calamars à la Romaine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Calamars à la Romaine lists: Gluten, Molluscs.
Ingredients
Calamars à la Romaine
40% calmar géant (mollusques), farine de blé, eau, amidon (blé), huiles vegetales (tournesol, colza), levure, sel, sucre, épaississants (carraghenanes), gomme guar, poudre à lever (diphosphates), carbonates de sodium, riboflavines,
Anneaux À La Romaine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Calamars à la Romaine or Anneaux À La Romaine?
Overall, Calamars à la Romaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Anneaux À La Romaine has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 235 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Calamars à la Romaine has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2 g per 100 g.