Comparison

Café latte Starbucks vs Café natural

Overall, Café natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCafé latte StarbucksCafé natural
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 70 kcal 212 kcal
Fat 2.6 g 8 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 3.2 g
Sugars 8.2 g 2.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber — 50 g
Protein 2.8 g 16 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Café latte Starbucks has 67% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 212 kcal).
  • Café latte Starbucks has 68% less fat (2.6 g vs 8 g).
  • Café latte Starbucks has 47% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Café natural has 68% less sugar (2.6 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Café natural has 83% more protein (16 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Café natural has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Café latte Starbucks

SKAN MUNa de accura salontes (guna gellan, carragenanos) Compro taken alaboración con Conservación Internacional NGEDENTES: Latte 3,1% M.G. (753), cale Arabica Starbucks liga 198, apar (4,2%), inulina de chicoria, regulador de acidez 6046 es gona gelara, camragenano). Comprometemo-nos a un b teen laboração com a Conservação Internacional 32E DK M224 EC ENO Enjoy cold Shake well Producido por Prodo NOVETAL amo y Arla Foods and Viby Dinamarca www. arlafoods pr

Café natural

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Café latte Starbucks or Café natural?

Overall, Café natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Café latte Starbucks has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 212 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Café natural has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 8.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons