Burger Maxi Complet vs Soft Pittas
Overall, Soft Pittas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Burger Maxi Complet | Soft Pittas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft Pittas has 31% less fat (2.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Soft Pittas has 16% less sugar (4 g vs 4.7 g).
- Burger Maxi Complet has 16% more fiber (6.4 g vs 5.4 g).
- Only Burger Maxi Complet lists: Sesame seeds.
- Only Soft Pittas lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Burger Maxi Complet
Farine complète de _blé_ 57%, eau, sucre, gluten de _blé_, _graines de sésame_ 2%, levure, huile de colza, alcool 1,2%, sel, farine de _blé_, levain de _blé_ dévitalisé, poudre d'acérola. Peut contenir des traces de lait et d'œuf.
Soft Pittas
Wholemeal Wheat Flour, Water, Wheat Gluten, Yeast, Dextrose, Salt, Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Sugar, Malted Barley Flour, Emulsifiers: E471, E481; Gelling Agent: E466; Stabiliser: Xanthan Gum; Soya Flour, Preservative: Calcium Propionate; Caramelised Sugar, Vegetable Oils (Sustainable Palm, Rapeseed), Flour Treatment Agents: Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), E920 (Vegetarian).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Burger Maxi Complet or Soft Pittas?
Overall, Soft Pittas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft Pittas has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soft Pittas has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.