Soft Pittas vs Panes especiales tomate y orégano
Overall, Soft Pittas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soft Pittas | Panes especiales tomate y or... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 483 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 23.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 5.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 7 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft Pittas has 50% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 483 kcal).
- Soft Pittas has 90% less fat (2.2 g vs 23.1 g).
- Soft Pittas has 70% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.1 g).
- Soft Pittas has 14% less sugar (4 g vs 4.6 g).
- Soft Pittas has 55% less salt (0.9 g vs 2 g).
- Soft Pittas has 39% more fiber (5.4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Soft Pittas has 19% more protein (11.9 g vs 9.6 g).
- Soft Pittas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Panes especiales tomate y orégano is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soft Pittas lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Soft Pittas
Wholemeal Wheat Flour, Water, Wheat Gluten, Yeast, Dextrose, Salt, Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Sugar, Malted Barley Flour, Emulsifiers: E471, E481; Gelling Agent: E466; Stabiliser: Xanthan Gum; Soya Flour, Preservative: Calcium Propionate; Caramelised Sugar, Vegetable Oils (Sustainable Palm, Rapeseed), Flour Treatment Agents: Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), E920 (Vegetarian).
Panes especiales tomate y orégano
Harina de trigo (GLUTEN), aceite de girasol alto oleico, condimento preparado de sales y especias (tomate en polvo deshidratado (5,9%), orégano (0,4%) y sal), levadura, sal, azúcar, harina de malta CEBADA (GLUTEN) y agente de tratamiento de la harina: acido ascórbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soft Pittas or Panes especiales tomate y orégano?
Overall, Soft Pittas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft Pittas has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soft Pittas has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.