Burger de colin d’Alaska vs Pate- tuniak pasta
Overall, Burger de colin d’Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Burger de colin d’Alaska | Pate- tuniak pasta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 191 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 5 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 13.1 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Fish, Gluten, Milk | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burger de colin d’Alaska has 19% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 237 kcal).
- Burger de colin d’Alaska has 47% less fat (9.5 g vs 18 g).
- Burger de colin d’Alaska has 63% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
- Burger de colin d’Alaska has 79% less salt (1.1 g vs 5 g).
- Burger de colin d’Alaska has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Burger de colin d’Alaska lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Burger de colin d’Alaska
65% colin d'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma), eau, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de blé, amidon modifié, farine de maïs, amidon de blé, amidon modifié de maïs, épaississant: E461, sel, gluten de blé, lait écrémé en poudre, poudres à lever E450i, E500ii. Traces éventuelles de mollusques, ceufs, céleri, soja.
Pate- tuniak pasta
Tuna* 47%, water, corn oil, rice starch, flavors, salt. Sterilised product. Contains no preservatives. *Euthynnus (Katsuwonus) pelamis.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Burger de colin d’Alaska or Pate- tuniak pasta?
Overall, Burger de colin d’Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burger de colin d’Alaska has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate- tuniak pasta has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.