Comparison

Brioche tressée à la coupe vs Brioche tradition

Overall, Brioche tradition has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBrioche tressée à la coupeBrioche tradition
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 376 kcal 338 kcal
Fat 16.5 g 12 g
Saturated fat 10 g 7.2 g
Sugars 12 g 13 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 1.9 g
Protein 6.5 g 7.5 g
Additives32
AllergensEggs, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Brioche tradition has 10% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 376 kcal).
  • Brioche tradition has 27% less fat (12 g vs 16.5 g).
  • Brioche tradition has 28% less saturated fat (7.2 g vs 10 g).
  • Brioche tradition has 13% more protein (7.5 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Brioche tradition has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Brioche tradition lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Brioche tressée à la coupe

BRIOCHE TRESSEE PB A LA COUPE ingredients: Farine de BLEC GLUTEN). Ievain(farine de BLECGLUTEN). eau). BEURRE concentré reconstitue 16. 5%(LAIT) (colorant: beta carotene). sucre. OEUFS frais. sirop de sucre inverti. CRÈME fraiche(LAIT), eau. rhum. levure.sel.aromes. emulsifiants(E471.E4B1)- Decors: sucre perlé (sucre. huile vegetale de palme).

Brioche tradition

Farine de blé 48%, œuf 12%, beurre, sucre, lait demi-écrémé, eau, levure, rhum, arôme fleur d'oranger, sel, arôme (colorant : E150a, alcool), gluten de blé, antioxydant: E300

FAQ

Which is healthier: Brioche tressée à la coupe or Brioche tradition?

Overall, Brioche tradition has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Brioche tradition has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 376 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Brioche tressée à la coupe has less sugar: 12 g versus 13 g per 100 g.

More comparisons