Bresaola vs Bresaola italienne - Aoste
Overall, Bresaola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bresaola | Bresaola italienne - Aoste |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.1 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 36 g | 34 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bresaola has 31% less fat (1.8 g vs 2.6 g).
- Bresaola italienne - Aoste has 12% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Bresaola has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Bresaola italienne - Aoste lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Bresaola
Viande bovine (origine : italie), sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium et nitrate de potassium. Traces éventuelles de fruits à coque, lait et oeuf.
Bresaola italienne - Aoste
Viande de boeuf origine U.E. ou hors U.E., sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium. Présence possible de fruits a coques et de lait.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bresaola or Bresaola italienne - Aoste?
Overall, Bresaola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bresaola italienne - Aoste has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bresaola has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.