Bresaola italienne - Aoste vs Bresaola punta d’anca
Overall, Bresaola italienne - Aoste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bresaola italienne - Aoste
Bresaola punta d’anca
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bresaola italienne - Aoste | Bresaola punta d’anca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 184 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 34 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bresaola italienne - Aoste has 13% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 184 kcal).
- Bresaola italienne - Aoste has 26% less fat (2.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Bresaola italienne - Aoste has 50% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Bresaola italienne - Aoste has 12% more protein (34 g vs 30 g).
- Only Bresaola italienne - Aoste lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Bresaola italienne - Aoste
Viande de boeuf origine U.E. ou hors U.E., sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium. Présence possible de fruits a coques et de lait.
Bresaola punta d’anca
Carne di bovino, sale, destrosio, aromi naturali, conservanti: (nitrito di sodio, nitrito di potassio)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bresaola italienne - Aoste or Bresaola punta d’anca?
Overall, Bresaola italienne - Aoste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bresaola italienne - Aoste has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 184 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bresaola italienne - Aoste has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.