Bran Sticks vs Riccioli di crusca
Overall, Bran Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bran Sticks | Riccioli di crusca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 215 kcal | 315 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 41.3 g | — |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bran Sticks has 32% fewer calories (215 kcal vs 315 kcal).
- Riccioli di crusca has 33% less fat (3 g vs 4.5 g).
- Riccioli di crusca has 64% less sugar (1.7 g vs 4.7 g).
- Bran Sticks has 77% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
- Bran Sticks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Riccioli di crusca lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bran Sticks
Wheat bran Barley Malt flour
Riccioli di crusca
RICCIOLI DI CRUSCA. PRODOTTO ESTRUSO. Ingredienti: crusca di GRANO TENERO 70%, farina di mais, sale marino. Può contenere SOIA, SESAMO, SENAPE e FRUTTA A GUSCIO.CONTIENE GLUTINE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bran Sticks or Riccioli di crusca?
Overall, Bran Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bran Sticks has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riccioli di crusca has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.