Comparison

Blüten Honig vs Biscoff Creme-Creamy

Overall, Blüten Honig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBlüten HonigBiscoff Creme-Creamy
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 2 3
Calories 379 kcal 584 kcal
Fat 23 g 38.1 g
Saturated fat 12 g 7.6 g
Sugars 2.2 g 36.8 g
Salt 1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 3.8 g 0.8 g
Protein 4.6 g 2.9 g
Additives03
AllergensGlutenGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Blüten Honig has 35% fewer calories (379 kcal vs 584 kcal).
  • Blüten Honig has 40% less fat (23 g vs 38.1 g).
  • Biscoff Creme-Creamy has 37% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 12 g).
  • Blüten Honig has 94% less sugar (2.2 g vs 36.8 g).
  • Biscoff Creme-Creamy has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Blüten Honig has 79% more fiber (3.8 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Blüten Honig has 37% more protein (4.6 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Blüten Honig has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Blüten Honig is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Biscoff Creme-Creamy lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Blüten Honig

wheat flour, water, palm fat, rapeseed oil, alcohol vinegar, salt, yeast disabled, traces possible has milk,

Biscoff Creme-Creamy

Karamellgebäck 58% (Weizenmehl, Zucker, pflanzliche Öle (Palmöl*, Rapsöl), Kandissirup, Backtriebmittel (Natriumhydrogencarbonat), Sojamehl, Salz, Zimt), Rapsöl, Zucker, Emulgator (Sojalecithin), Säuerungsmittel (Zitronensäure). *zertifiziertes Palmöl aus nachhaltigem Anbau.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Blüten Honig or Biscoff Creme-Creamy?

Overall, Blüten Honig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Blüten Honig has fewer calories: 379 kcal versus 584 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Blüten Honig has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 36.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons