Comparison

Black Angus Rindercarpaccio vs Carpaccio Parmesan

Overall, Carpaccio Parmesan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBlack Angus RindercarpaccioCarpaccio Parmesan
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 191 kcal 275 kcal
Fat 11 g 21.7 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 3.5 g
Sugars 1.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 2 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 21 g 19.4 g
Additives40
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 31% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 275 kcal).
  • Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 49% less fat (11 g vs 21.7 g).
  • Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 11% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Carpaccio Parmesan has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Carpaccio Parmesan has 88% less salt (0.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Carpaccio Parmesan has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Carpaccio Parmesan is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Black Angus Rindercarpaccio

82% Rindfleisch gepökelt (96 % Rindfleisch, Speisesalz, Zucker, Dextrose, Säureregulator: Kaliumlactat, Natriumacetat; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; natürliches Aroma, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Starterkulturen, Buchenholzrauch), 9% Olivenöl, 9% Hartkäse gerieben (Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, tierisches Lab). Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.

Carpaccio Parmesan

Bœuf , parmesan, huile d’olive

FAQ

Which is healthier: Black Angus Rindercarpaccio or Carpaccio Parmesan?

Overall, Carpaccio Parmesan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 275 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carpaccio Parmesan has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons