Carpaccio Olives vs Black Angus Rindercarpaccio
Overall, Carpaccio Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio Olives | Black Angus Rindercarpaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 216 kcal | 191 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 12% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 216 kcal).
- Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 31% less fat (11 g vs 16 g).
- Carpaccio Olives has 29% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Carpaccio Olives has no sugar, while Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 1.5 g.
- Carpaccio Olives has 62% less salt (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 19% more protein (21 g vs 17 g).
- Carpaccio Olives has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Black Angus Rindercarpaccio lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Carpaccio Olives
viande bovine 80%, marinade épicée 7% (huile de colza, arômes, extrait de paprika), Olives vertes concassées 6,2 % (olives, sel), huile d’olive, huile de colza, câpres (câpres, eau, sel), ail, concentré de citron (concentré de jus de citron, pulpe de citron, arôme, acidifiant : E330), sel.
Black Angus Rindercarpaccio
82% Rindfleisch gepökelt (96 % Rindfleisch, Speisesalz, Zucker, Dextrose, Säureregulator: Kaliumlactat, Natriumacetat; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; natürliches Aroma, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Starterkulturen, Buchenholzrauch), 9% Olivenöl, 9% Hartkäse gerieben (Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, tierisches Lab). Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio Olives or Black Angus Rindercarpaccio?
Overall, Carpaccio Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Carpaccio Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.