Comparison

Carpaccio Parmesan vs Black Angus Rindercarpaccio

Overall, Carpaccio Parmesan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCarpaccio ParmesanBlack Angus Rindercarpaccio
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 179 kcal 191 kcal
Fat 18 g 11 g
Saturated fat 3.2 g 3.1 g
Sugars 0 g 1.5 g
Salt 0.4 g 2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 18 g 21 g
Additives04
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 39% less fat (11 g vs 18 g).
  • Carpaccio Parmesan has no sugar, while Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 1.5 g.
  • Carpaccio Parmesan has 81% less salt (0.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Black Angus Rindercarpaccio has 14% more protein (21 g vs 18 g).
  • Carpaccio Parmesan has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Carpaccio Parmesan

Carpaccio mariné 87% : viande bovine française 80 %, marinade épicée 7 % (huile de colza, arômes naturels) ; dosette d'huile 7% : huile de colza, huile d'olive 2,8% ; parmesan râpé (lait) 6%.

Black Angus Rindercarpaccio

82% Rindfleisch gepökelt (96 % Rindfleisch, Speisesalz, Zucker, Dextrose, Säureregulator: Kaliumlactat, Natriumacetat; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; natürliches Aroma, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Starterkulturen, Buchenholzrauch), 9% Olivenöl, 9% Hartkäse gerieben (Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, tierisches Lab). Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Carpaccio Parmesan or Black Angus Rindercarpaccio?

Overall, Carpaccio Parmesan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carpaccio Parmesan has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 191 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carpaccio Parmesan has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons