BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dried & salted beef vs Bresaola italienne - Aoste
Overall, Bresaola italienne - Aoste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dried & salted beef
Bresaola italienne - Aoste
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dri... | Bresaola italienne - Aoste |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 141 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 34 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dried & salted beef has 12% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- Bresaola italienne - Aoste has 48% less fat (2.6 g vs 5 g).
- Bresaola italienne - Aoste has 73% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Only Bresaola italienne - Aoste lists: Milk.
Ingredients
BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dried & salted beef
came de vită Black Angus, 4% sare, dextroză, arome naturale, conservanț: nitrit de sodiu, nitrat de potasiu.
Bresaola italienne - Aoste
Viande de boeuf origine U.E. ou hors U.E., sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium. Présence possible de fruits a coques et de lait.
FAQ
Which is healthier: BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dried & salted beef or Bresaola italienne - Aoste?
Overall, Bresaola italienne - Aoste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dried & salted beef has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
BLACK ANGUS BRESAOLA air dried & salted beef has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.