Comparison

Bizcocho con zanahoria vs Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena

Overall, Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBizcocho con zanahoriaPan de Molde Integral con Ce...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 450 kcal 266 kcal
Fat 25.5 g 4.1 g
Saturated fat 3.7 g 0.7 g
Sugars 26 g 3.4 g
Salt 1.2 g 2.3 g
Protein 6.6 g 9.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has 41% fewer calories (266 kcal vs 450 kcal).
  • Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has 84% less fat (4.1 g vs 25.5 g).
  • Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has 82% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has 87% less sugar (3.4 g vs 26 g).
  • Bizcocho con zanahoria has 48% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has 33% more protein (9.8 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bizcocho con zanahoria

Not available.

Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bizcocho con zanahoria or Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena?

Overall, Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has fewer calories: 266 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pan de Molde Integral con Centeno y Copos de avena has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons