Bio-Schinkenlyoner vs Geflügellyoner
Overall, Geflügellyoner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Schinkenlyoner | Geflügellyoner |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 272 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Schinkenlyoner has 11% fewer calories (243 kcal vs 272 kcal).
- Bio-Schinkenlyoner has 16% less fat (21 g vs 25 g).
- Geflügellyoner has 63% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 9 g).
- Geflügellyoner has no sugar, while Bio-Schinkenlyoner has 1 g.
- Geflügellyoner has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio-Schinkenlyoner
Not available.
Geflügellyoner
Mechanisch getrenntes Pouletfleisch 50% (Schweiz), Rapsöl 19%, Wasser, Pouletfleisch 12% (Schweiz), Nitritpökelsatz (Kochsatz, Konservierungsstoff (E 250]), Stabilisatoren (E 262, E450, E451), Gewürze, Glucose, Würze, Antioxidationsmittel (E 301), Glucosesirup, Gewürzextrakte.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Schinkenlyoner or Geflügellyoner?
Overall, Geflügellyoner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio-Schinkenlyoner has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 272 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Geflügellyoner has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.