Comparison

Bio Hokkaido Kürbis vs Besan ladoo

Overall, Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio Hokkaido KürbisBesan ladoo
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 15 kcal 481 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 25 g
Saturated fat 0 g 18 g
Sugars 1.6 g 30 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.3 g 3 g
Protein 1.1 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has 97% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 481 kcal).
  • Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 25 g).
  • Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has 100% less saturated fat (0 g vs 18 g).
  • Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has 95% less sugar (1.6 g vs 30 g).
  • Besan ladoo has 57% more fiber (3 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Besan ladoo has 90% more protein (11 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bio Hokkaido Kürbis

Kürbis

Besan ladoo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Hokkaido Kürbis or Besan ladoo?

Overall, Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 481 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Hokkaido Kürbis has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 30 g per 100 g.

More comparisons