Bio-Haselnusskerne vs Hasselnusskerne
Overall, Hasselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Haselnusskerne | Hasselnusskerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 661 kcal | 668 kcal |
| Fat | 62 g | 64 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 7.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Haselnusskerne has 22% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Hasselnusskerne has 66% less sugar (2.5 g vs 7.4 g).
- Hasselnusskerne has 32% more fiber (12 g vs 8.2 g).
- Hasselnusskerne has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
- Only Bio-Haselnusskerne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Bio-Haselnusskerne
Haselnusskerne
Hasselnusskerne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Haselnusskerne or Hasselnusskerne?
Overall, Hasselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio-Haselnusskerne has fewer calories: 661 kcal versus 668 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hasselnusskerne has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.