Comparison

Bio-Haselnusskerne vs Hasselnusskerne

Overall, Hasselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio-HaselnusskerneHasselnusskerne
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 661 kcal 668 kcal
Fat 62 g 64 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 5.8 g
Sugars 7.4 g 2.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 8.2 g 12 g
Protein 12 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Haselnusskerne has 22% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Hasselnusskerne has 66% less sugar (2.5 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Hasselnusskerne has 32% more fiber (12 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Hasselnusskerne has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
  • Only Bio-Haselnusskerne lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Bio-Haselnusskerne

Haselnusskerne

Hasselnusskerne

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio-Haselnusskerne or Hasselnusskerne?

Overall, Hasselnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio-Haselnusskerne has fewer calories: 661 kcal versus 668 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hasselnusskerne has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons