Biezpiena Krēms ar Jogurtu Mango-Persiku vs Milk benessere
Overall, Milk benessere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Biezpiena Krēms ar Jogurtu M... | Milk benessere |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 122 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 13.3 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milk benessere has 26% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Milk benessere has 17% less sugar (11 g vs 13.3 g).
- Biezpiena Krēms ar Jogurtu Mango-Persiku has 29% more protein (7 g vs 5 g).
- Only Biezpiena Krēms ar Jogurtu Mango-Persiku lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Biezpiena Krēms ar Jogurtu Mango-Persiku
Vajpiena biezpiens 53%, jogurts 20% (piens, cukurs, stabilizetaji (modificēta kukuruzas ciete, pektins), ieraugs), mango persiku piedeva 14% (cukurs, mango 20%, persiki 20%, modificēta kukurūzas ciete, dabīgs mango aromatizētājs, biezinātājs (pektins), skabuma reguletaji (itronskabe, kalcija citrāts, nātrija citrats), krāsviela (beta kartins), saldajs krējums, cukurs.
Milk benessere
CUN CRDCCANTE ALLA eselatads Johnsoni, presaraione edealoh t net themophils attacls Lber,olio di semit farira riso. Zucher Sai sale atiossda ciole triate 2053 es erarteseata aggiunt aas
FAQ
Which is healthier: Biezpiena Krēms ar Jogurtu Mango-Persiku or Milk benessere?
Overall, Milk benessere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milk benessere has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milk benessere has less sugar: 11 g versus 13.3 g per 100 g.