Betterave Bio vs Remolacha cocida pelada
Overall, Betterave Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Betterave Bio | Remolacha cocida pelada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 51 kcal | 52 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 9.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Betterave Bio has 17% less sugar (7.6 g vs 9.2 g).
- Betterave Bio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Betterave Bio
Betterave rouge
Remolacha cocida pelada
Remolacha
FAQ
Which is healthier: Betterave Bio or Remolacha cocida pelada?
Overall, Betterave Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Betterave Bio has fewer calories: 51 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Betterave Bio has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.