Comparison
Basilic feuilles coupées vs Basilic coupé
Overall, Basilic feuilles coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Basilic feuilles coupées | Basilic coupé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 6.1 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Basilic feuilles coupées has 45% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 67 kcal).
- Basilic feuilles coupées has 87% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.9 g).
- Basilic coupé has 39% more fiber (6.1 g vs 3.7 g).
- Basilic feuilles coupées has 24% more protein (3.6 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Basilic feuilles coupées
Basilic
Basilic coupé
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Basilic feuilles coupées or Basilic coupé?
Overall, Basilic feuilles coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Basilic feuilles coupées has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Basilic feuilles coupées has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.