Comparison
Basilic feuilles coupées vs Basil
Overall, Basilic feuilles coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Basilic feuilles coupées | Basil |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 169 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 38 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Basilic feuilles coupées has 78% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 169 kcal).
- Basilic feuilles coupées has 88% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.1 g).
- Basilic feuilles coupées has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Basilic feuilles coupées has 77% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Basil has 90% more fiber (38 g vs 3.7 g).
- Basil has 84% more protein (23 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Basilic feuilles coupées
Basilic
Basil
BASIL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Basilic feuilles coupées or Basil?
Overall, Basilic feuilles coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Basilic feuilles coupées has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Basilic feuilles coupées has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.