Comparison
Basilic vs Ciboulette
Overall, Ciboulette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Basilic | Ciboulette |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 37.7 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 21.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciboulette has 31% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 169 kcal).
- Ciboulette has 14% less fat (3.5 g vs 4.1 g).
- Ciboulette has 72% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Ciboulette has no sugar, while Basilic has 1.7 g.
Ingredients
Basilic
Basilic déshydraté.
Ciboulette
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Basilic or Ciboulette?
Overall, Ciboulette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ciboulette has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ciboulette has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.