Comparison
Ciboulette vs Verstegen bieslook
Overall, Verstegen bieslook has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ciboulette | Verstegen bieslook |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 116 kcal | 30 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Verstegen bieslook has 74% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 116 kcal).
- Verstegen bieslook has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Verstegen bieslook has 75% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Ciboulette has no sugar, while Verstegen bieslook has 1.8 g.
- Ciboulette has 88% more protein (21.2 g vs 2.6 g).
Ingredients
Ciboulette
Not available.
Verstegen bieslook
bieslook
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ciboulette or Verstegen bieslook?
Overall, Verstegen bieslook has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Verstegen bieslook has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ciboulette has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.