Comparison

Bambussprossen vs Bambussprossen

Overall, Bambussprossen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Bambussprossen

Bambussprossen

ASIA GREEN GARDEN · 180g
a NOVA 1
Bambussprossen

Bambussprossen

Rewe Beste Wahl · 175g
a NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBambussprossenBambussprossen
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 12 kcal 20 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.8 g 1.1 g
Protein 1.3 g 1.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bambussprossen has 40% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 20 kcal).
  • Bambussprossen has no sugar, while Bambussprossen has 0.7 g.
  • Bambussprossen has 19% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.3 g).

Ingredients

Bambussprossen

55 % Bambussprossen, Wasser.

Bambussprossen

Bambussprossen, Wasser.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bambussprossen or Bambussprossen?

Overall, Bambussprossen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bambussprossen has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bambussprossen has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Bambussprossen vs Bamboo Shoots in Water Bambussprossen vs Bamboo Shoots in Water Bambussprossen vs Bambussprossen in Scheib... Bambussprossen vs Bamboo Shoots Strips Bambussprossen vs Bamboo Shoots Strips Bambussprossen vs Bambussprossen in Scheib... Pousses de bambou vs Bambussprossen Bambussprossen vs Pousses de bambou en tra...