Pousses de bambou vs Bambussprossen
Overall, Bambussprossen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pousses de bambou | Bambussprossen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 34 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bambussprossen has 65% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 34 kcal).
- Bambussprossen has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Bambussprossen has no sugar, while Pousses de bambou has 0.5 g.
- Pousses de bambou has 35% more protein (2 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Pousses de bambou
Pousse de bambou (52%), eau, régulateur d'acidité (acide ascorbique, acide citrique)
Bambussprossen
55 % Bambussprossen, Wasser.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pousses de bambou or Bambussprossen?
Overall, Bambussprossen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bambussprossen has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bambussprossen has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.