Comparison

Baking Powder vs Stevia sweet Poudre

Overall, Stevia sweet Poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBaking PowderStevia sweet Poudre
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 161 kcal 114 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g —
Sugars 0.3 g 14.3 g
Salt 35.7 g —
Fiber 2.9 g 57.1 g
Protein 3.5 g 0 g
Additives42
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Stevia sweet Poudre has 29% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 161 kcal).
  • Stevia sweet Poudre has no fat, while Baking Powder has 0.7 g.
  • Baking Powder has 98% less sugar (0.3 g vs 14.3 g).
  • Stevia sweet Poudre has 95% more fiber (57.1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Baking Powder has 100% more protein (3.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Baking Powder lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Baking Powder

Raising agents, disodium diphosphate, sodium hydrogen carbonate, wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin.

Stevia sweet Poudre

Maltodextrin 55%, Fuctofibers(Inulin 34%, Oligofuctrose 8%), Steviol Glycosides, Thaumatin

FAQ

Which is healthier: Baking Powder or Stevia sweet Poudre?

Overall, Stevia sweet Poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stevia sweet Poudre has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baking Powder has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 14.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons