Bakarwadi vs Masala-ae-Magic
Overall, Masala-ae-Magic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bakarwadi | Masala-ae-Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 544 kcal | 166 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 9 g | 13.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 27.3 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 9.1 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Masala-ae-Magic has 69% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 544 kcal).
- Masala-ae-Magic has 92% less fat (2.9 g vs 36 g).
- Masala-ae-Magic has 83% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 8 g).
- Bakarwadi has 33% less sugar (9 g vs 13.5 g).
- Bakarwadi has 93% less salt (2 g vs 27.3 g).
- Masala-ae-Magic has 45% more fiber (9.1 g vs 5 g).
- Bakarwadi has 53% more protein (9 g vs 4.2 g).
- Only Bakarwadi lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Bakarwadi
Refined Wheat Flour (Maida), Bengal Gram Flour, Refined Groundnut Oil, Sugar Syrup (Refined Sugar, Water), Refined Sugar, Green Chilli, Iodised Salt, Coriander Leaves, Grated Desiccated Coconut, Spices (Red Chilli Powder, Cumin Seed Powder, Coriander Seed Powder, Asafoetida), Tamarind Concentrate, Coriander Leaf Extract, Sesame Seeds.
Masala-ae-Magic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bakarwadi or Masala-ae-Magic?
Overall, Masala-ae-Magic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Masala-ae-Magic has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 544 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bakarwadi has less sugar: 9 g versus 13.5 g per 100 g.