Comparison

Krydder m/Lime og Chili vs Masala-ae-Magic

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKrydder m/Lime og ChiliMasala-ae-Magic
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 190 kcal 166 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 2.9 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 1.4 g
Sugars 0 g 13.5 g
Salt 48.5 g 27.3 g
Fiber 0 g 9.1 g
Protein 4 g 4.2 g
Additives24
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Masala-ae-Magic has 13% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 190 kcal).
  • Krydder m/Lime og Chili has 14% less fat (2.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Krydder m/Lime og Chili has 64% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Krydder m/Lime og Chili has no sugar, while Masala-ae-Magic has 13.5 g.
  • Masala-ae-Magic has 44% less salt (27.3 g vs 48.5 g).
  • Masala-ae-Magic has 100% more fiber (9.1 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Krydder m/Lime og Chili

Chilipepper, havsalt, surhetsregulerende middel: sitronsyre e330, dehydrert limejuice, antiklumpemiddel: silisiumdioksid e551.

Masala-ae-Magic

Mixed spices (35.3%) (*roasted spice powder (17.5%) (cumin, coriander, turmeric, aniseed, black pepper, fenugreek, ginger, clove, green cardamom powder, nutmeg), red chilli powder, dehydrated onion, dried garlic, capsicum extract, coriander extract, cumin extract), iodized salt, sugar, starch, flavour enhancer (635), thickener (508), palm oil, acidity regulator (330), natural flavouring substance, mineral, colour (150d) and vitamin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Krydder m/Lime og Chili or Masala-ae-Magic?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Masala-ae-Magic has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Krydder m/Lime og Chili has less sugar: 0 g versus 13.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons