Comparison
Baie des incas vs Bio-Physalis
Overall, Bio-Physalis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baie des incas | Bio-Physalis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 325 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 25 g | — |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Physalis has 89% less sugar (5 g vs 45 g).
- Bio-Physalis has 37% more protein (10 g vs 6.3 g).
Ingredients
Baie des incas
Baies des incas
Bio-Physalis
Physalis getrocknet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baie des incas or Bio-Physalis?
Overall, Bio-Physalis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baie des incas has fewer calories: 303 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Physalis has less sugar: 5 g versus 45 g per 100 g.