Comparison
Physalis getrocknet vs Bio-Physalis
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Physalis getrocknet | Bio-Physalis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 325 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 42.6 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 22.1 g | — |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis getrocknet has 23% fewer calories (249 kcal vs 325 kcal).
- Physalis getrocknet has no fat, while Bio-Physalis has 4.9 g.
- Physalis getrocknet has no saturated fat, while Bio-Physalis has 1.1 g.
- Bio-Physalis has 88% less sugar (5 g vs 42.6 g).
- Bio-Physalis has 41% more protein (10 g vs 5.9 g).
Ingredients
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis getrocknet
Bio-Physalis
Physalis getrocknet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Physalis getrocknet or Bio-Physalis?
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis getrocknet has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Physalis has less sugar: 5 g versus 42.6 g per 100 g.