Comparison
Physalys vs Bio-Physalis
Overall, Bio-Physalis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Physalys | Bio-Physalis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 366 kcal | 325 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 62 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 7 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio-Physalis has 11% fewer calories (325 kcal vs 366 kcal).
- Bio-Physalis has 18% less fat (4.9 g vs 6 g).
- Bio-Physalis has 92% less sugar (5 g vs 62 g).
- Bio-Physalis has 30% more protein (10 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Physalys
Not available.
Bio-Physalis
Physalis getrocknet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Physalys or Bio-Physalis?
Overall, Bio-Physalis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio-Physalis has fewer calories: 325 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Physalis has less sugar: 5 g versus 62 g per 100 g.