Comparison
Bio-Physalis vs Physalis getrocknet
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Physalis | Physalis getrocknet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 325 kcal | 302 kcal |
| Fat | 4.9 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 36 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 21 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis getrocknet has 16% less fat (4.1 g vs 4.9 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 55% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Bio-Physalis has 86% less sugar (5 g vs 36 g).
- Bio-Physalis has 24% more protein (10 g vs 7.6 g).
Ingredients
Bio-Physalis
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Physalis or Physalis getrocknet?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis getrocknet has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Physalis has less sugar: 5 g versus 36 g per 100 g.