Comparison
Baie des incas vs Physalis getrocknet
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baie des incas | Physalis getrocknet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 302 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 36 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 25 g | 21 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis getrocknet has 21% less fat (4.1 g vs 5.2 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 20% less sugar (36 g vs 45 g).
- Baie des incas has 16% more fiber (25 g vs 21 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 17% more protein (7.6 g vs 6.3 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Baie des incas
Baies des incas
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baie des incas or Physalis getrocknet?
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis getrocknet has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Physalis getrocknet has less sugar: 36 g versus 45 g per 100 g.