Comparison
Physalis getrocknet vs Baie des incas
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Physalis getrocknet | Baie des incas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 303 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 42.6 g | 45 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 22.1 g | 25 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis getrocknet has 18% fewer calories (249 kcal vs 303 kcal).
- Physalis getrocknet has no fat, while Baie des incas has 5.2 g.
- Physalis getrocknet has no saturated fat, while Baie des incas has 0.9 g.
- Baie des incas has 12% more fiber (25 g vs 22.1 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis getrocknet
Baie des incas
Baies des incas
FAQ
Which is healthier: Physalis getrocknet or Baie des incas?
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis getrocknet has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Physalis getrocknet has less sugar: 42.6 g versus 45 g per 100 g.