Backoblden vs Śląskie oblaty cebulowe
Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backoblden | Śląskie oblaty cebulowe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 363 kcal | 419 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 8.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 11.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backoblden has 13% fewer calories (363 kcal vs 419 kcal).
- Backoblden has 87% less fat (1.1 g vs 8.7 g).
- Backoblden has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Backoblden has 43% less sugar (2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Backoblden has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
- Śląskie oblaty cebulowe has 20% more protein (11.2 g vs 9 g).
- Backoblden has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Śląskie oblaty cebulowe lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Backoblden
Not available.
Śląskie oblaty cebulowe
Mąka _pszenna_, cebula suszona 3 %, sól, olej rzepakowy, _mleko_ odtłuszczone w proszku, pieprz mielony.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backoblden or Śląskie oblaty cebulowe?
Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Backoblden has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 419 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backoblden has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.