Comparison

Backoblden vs Śląskie oblaty cebulowe

Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBackobldenŚląskie oblaty cebulowe
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 363 kcal 419 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 8.7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.8 g
Sugars 2 g 3.5 g
Salt 0 g 2.5 g
Fiber — 2.4 g
Protein 9 g 11.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Backoblden has 13% fewer calories (363 kcal vs 419 kcal).
  • Backoblden has 87% less fat (1.1 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Backoblden has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Backoblden has 43% less sugar (2 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Backoblden has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Śląskie oblaty cebulowe has 20% more protein (11.2 g vs 9 g).
  • Backoblden has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Śląskie oblaty cebulowe lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Backoblden

Not available.

Śląskie oblaty cebulowe

Mąka _pszenna_, cebula suszona 3 %, sól, olej rzepakowy, _mleko_ odtłuszczone w proszku, pieprz mielony.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backoblden or Śląskie oblaty cebulowe?

Overall, Backoblden has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Backoblden has fewer calories: 363 kcal versus 419 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Backoblden has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons