Comparison

Asia Style Gemüsepfanne vs Stir Fry Vegetable Mix

Overall, Stir Fry Vegetable Mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAsia Style GemüsepfanneStir Fry Vegetable Mix
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 53 kcal 45 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 3.9 g 3.6 g
Salt 0.6 g 0 g
Fiber — 2.8 g
Protein 2.2 g 1.2 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Soybeans, WeizenkörnerNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Stir Fry Vegetable Mix has 15% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 53 kcal).
  • Stir Fry Vegetable Mix has 33% less fat (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Stir Fry Vegetable Mix has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Asia Style Gemüsepfanne has 45% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Stir Fry Vegetable Mix is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Asia Style Gemüsepfanne lists: Gluten, Soybeans, Weizenkörner.

Ingredients

Asia Style Gemüsepfanne

13 % Karotten, 12 % Weißkohl, 11 % Erbsen, 10 % Porree, 9 % Blumenkohl, 9 % Champignons, 8 % Mungobohnenkeime, 7 % Paprika, 7% Judasohrenpilze, 4 % Zuckerschoten, 3 % Bambussprossen, Sojasauce (_Sojabohnen_, Wasser, _Weizenkörner_), Rapsöl, Zucker, kandierter Ingwer (Zucker, Wasser, Ingwer, Ingwerextrakt), Speisesalz, Dextrose.

Stir Fry Vegetable Mix

Carrot. Broccoli. Bean Sprouts. Red Onion. Red Pepper. Yellow Pepper. Sugarsnap Peas. Babycorn. Water Chestnut.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Asia Style Gemüsepfanne or Stir Fry Vegetable Mix?

Overall, Stir Fry Vegetable Mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stir Fry Vegetable Mix has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Stir Fry Vegetable Mix has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons