Comparison

Asia Nuts Wasabi Style vs Hazelnut Bites

Overall, Hazelnut Bites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAsia Nuts Wasabi StyleHazelnut Bites
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 458 kcal 456 kcal
Fat 19.3 g 27.2 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 2.2 g
Sugars 23.4 g 35 g
Salt 1 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 8.1 g
Protein 10 g 9.7 g
Additives70
AllergensGluten, Peanuts, SoybeansPeanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Asia Nuts Wasabi Style has 29% less fat (19.3 g vs 27.2 g).
  • Hazelnut Bites has 50% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Asia Nuts Wasabi Style has 33% less sugar (23.4 g vs 35 g).
  • Hazelnut Bites has no salt, while Asia Nuts Wasabi Style has 1 g.
  • Hazelnut Bites has 100% more fiber (8.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Hazelnut Bites has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Asia Nuts Wasabi Style lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Asia Nuts Wasabi Style

27% Erdnusskerne, Weizenmehl, Zucker, Maisstärke, Maismehl, Palmöl, Speisesalz, Sojasauce (Weizen, Soja, Wasser, Speisesalz, Dextrin, Farbstoff: E 150c), Würzmischung (Dextrin, Verdickungsmittel: Gummi arabicum, Senfaroma, Palmöl, Antioxidationsmittel: Extrakt aus Rosmarin), Backtriebmittel: Natriumcarbonate, Kartoffelstärke, Säureregulator: Citronensäure, Farbstoff: E 141, Wasabipulver

Hazelnut Bites

Date Paste (61%). Roast Nibbed Peanuts (12%). Peanut Butter (12%). Peanut Flour, Chicory Fibre Syrup, Salt. .

FAQ

Which is healthier: Asia Nuts Wasabi Style or Hazelnut Bites?

Overall, Hazelnut Bites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hazelnut Bites has fewer calories: 456 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Asia Nuts Wasabi Style has less sugar: 23.4 g versus 35 g per 100 g.

More comparisons