Comparison

Arrabbiata vs Arrabbiata

Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientArrabbiataArrabbiata
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 53 kcal 83 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 3.4 g 8.5 g
Salt 1 g 1.4 g
Protein 1.3 g 2 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Arrabbiata has 36% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 83 kcal).
  • Arrabbiata has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Arrabbiata has 60% less sugar (3.4 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Arrabbiata has 29% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Arrabbiata has 35% more protein (2 g vs 1.3 g).

Ingredients

Arrabbiata

Not available.

Arrabbiata

CO ge b boni Arrabbiata LICHT PIKANT LÉGÈREMENT PIQUANTE GEBRUIKSKLAAR-PRETE A UTILISER 425 ge - 70 % pulpe de tomates - correcteur d'acidité (E330), eau, 5 % de concentré de tomates, 3 % poivrons rouges, 2,5 % oignons, huile de tournesol, amidon modifier, plante aromatique et épices, sel, sucre, 0,1 % Pili-Pili.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Arrabbiata or Arrabbiata?

Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Arrabbiata has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Arrabbiata has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons