Arrabbiata vs Arrabbiata
Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Arrabbiata | Arrabbiata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 83 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 8.5 g | 5.4 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arrabbiata has 28% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 83 kcal).
- Arrabbiata has 22% less fat (2.2 g vs 2.8 g).
- Arrabbiata has 36% less sugar (5.4 g vs 8.5 g).
- Arrabbiata has 17% more protein (2.4 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Arrabbiata
CO ge b boni Arrabbiata LICHT PIKANT LÉGÈREMENT PIQUANTE GEBRUIKSKLAAR-PRETE A UTILISER 425 ge - 70 % pulpe de tomates - correcteur d'acidité (E330), eau, 5 % de concentré de tomates, 3 % poivrons rouges, 2,5 % oignons, huile de tournesol, amidon modifier, plante aromatique et épices, sel, sucre, 0,1 % Pili-Pili.
Arrabbiata
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Arrabbiata or Arrabbiata?
Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arrabbiata has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Arrabbiata has less sugar: 5.4 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.