Comparison
Arrabbiata vs Arrabbiata
Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Arrabbiata | Arrabbiata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 5.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arrabbiata has 12% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 60 kcal).
- Arrabbiata has 13% less fat (2.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Arrabbiata has 37% less sugar (3.4 g vs 5.4 g).
- Arrabbiata has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Arrabbiata has 46% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Arrabbiata
Not available.
Arrabbiata
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Arrabbiata or Arrabbiata?
Overall, Arrabbiata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arrabbiata has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Arrabbiata has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.