Comparison
Amarante vs Amaranto
Overall, Amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amarante | Amaranto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 385 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 9.3 g |
| Protein | 14.8 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amarante has 10% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 385 kcal).
- Amarante has 38% less fat (4.1 g vs 6.6 g).
- Amarante has 40% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Amaranto has 20% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Amaranto has 46% more fiber (9.3 g vs 5 g).
- Amaranto has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Amarante
Amarante bio
Amaranto
procedentes de la agricultura ecológica).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amarante or Amaranto?
Overall, Amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amarante has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amaranto has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.