Amarante vs Amaranth gepufft
Overall, Amaranth gepufft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amarante | Amaranth gepufft |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 411 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 14.8 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amarante has 16% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 411 kcal).
- Amarante has 48% less fat (4.1 g vs 7.9 g).
- Amarante has 41% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Amaranth gepufft has 33% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Amaranth gepufft has 38% more fiber (8 g vs 5 g).
- Amaranth gepufft has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Amarante
Amarante bio
Amaranth gepufft
Amaranth* gepufft *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Soja, Milch, Mandel, Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amarante or Amaranth gepufft?
Overall, Amaranth gepufft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amarante has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 411 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amaranth gepufft has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.