Amaranth gepufft vs Amaranto
Overall, Amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amaranth gepufft | Amaranto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 411 kcal | 385 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 9.3 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amaranto has 17% less fat (6.6 g vs 7.9 g).
- Amaranto has 14% more fiber (9.3 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Amaranth gepufft
Amaranth* gepufft *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Soja, Milch, Mandel, Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.
Amaranto
procedentes de la agricultura ecológica).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amaranth gepufft or Amaranto?
Overall, Amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amaranto has fewer calories: 385 kcal versus 411 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amaranth gepufft has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.