Amandes California en poudre vs Amande poudre
Overall, Amandes California en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amandes California en poudre | Amande poudre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 628 kcal | 634 kcal |
| Fat | 52.9 g | 55 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.3 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.6 g | 12.6 g |
| Protein | 28.5 g | 25.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amande poudre has 73% less sugar (1.1 g vs 4 g).
- Amande poudre has 40% more fiber (12.6 g vs 7.6 g).
- Amandes California en poudre has 11% more protein (28.5 g vs 25.4 g).
- Amandes California en poudre has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Amandes California en poudre
Amandes 100%
Amande poudre
AMANDE POUDRE BLANCHE FINE C rigine:USA Traces d' arachldes et fruits à coquas possibles. Valeurs nutrit. onnelles
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amandes California en poudre or Amande poudre?
Overall, Amandes California en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amandes California en poudre has fewer calories: 628 kcal versus 634 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amande poudre has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 4 g per 100 g.