Comparison
Amandes vs Alemndra piel tostada sal
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amandes | Alemndra piel tostada sal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 641 kcal | 633 kcal |
| Fat | 56 g | 54.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 7.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 8.9 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 24.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alemndra piel tostada sal has 15% less saturated fat (4 g vs 4.7 g).
- Amandes has 12% less sugar (4.3 g vs 4.9 g).
- Amandes has 88% less salt (0.9 g vs 7.2 g).
- Amandes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Alemndra piel tostada sal lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Amandes
Not available.
Alemndra piel tostada sal
ALMENDRA piel, agua y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amandes or Alemndra piel tostada sal?
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alemndra piel tostada sal has fewer calories: 633 kcal versus 641 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amandes has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.