ALPSKO mleko vs 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk
Overall, 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
ALPSKO mleko
2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | ALPSKO mleko | 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtere... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 64 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mleko | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has 22% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 64 kcal).
- 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has 46% less fat (1.9 g vs 3.5 g).
- 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has 55% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.3 g).
- 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has 38% less sugar (2.9 g vs 4.7 g).
- 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has 43% more protein (5.8 g vs 3.3 g).
- 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only ALPSKO mleko lists: Mleko.
- Only 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk lists: Milk.
Ingredients
ALPSKO mleko
Sterilizovano homogenizovano punomasno _mleko_ sa 3,5% mlečne masti
2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk
ULTRA-FILTERED REDUCED-FAT MILK, LACTASE, VITAMIN A PALMITATE, VITAMIN D. CONTAINS: MILK.
FAQ
Which is healthier: ALPSKO mleko or 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk?
Overall, 2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2% Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.