Comparison

Alpro Cooking Soya vs Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank

Overall, Alpro Cooking Soya has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlpro Cooking SoyaBio Barista - Biologische sc...
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 142 kcal 59 kcal
Fat 14 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1.2 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.6 g 0.7 g
Protein 2 g 1 g
Additives12
AllergensSoybeansGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has 58% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 142 kcal).
  • Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has 77% less fat (3.2 g vs 14 g).
  • Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has 81% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Alpro Cooking Soya has 45% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Alpro Cooking Soya has 50% more protein (2 g vs 1 g).
  • Alpro Cooking Soya has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Alpro Cooking Soya lists: Soybeans.
  • Only Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Alpro Cooking Soya

saccharoseestere af fedtsyrer

Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank

Water, HAVER* 10% koolzaadolie, zeezout, zuurte - regelaar (kaliumcarbonaat). *Biologisch ingrediënt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alpro Cooking Soya or Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank?

Overall, Alpro Cooking Soya has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alpro Cooking Soya has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons